[U-Boot] [PATCH v8 1/9] mips: add base support for QCA/Atheros ath79 SOCs

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Thu Mar 17 04:44:54 CET 2016


On 03/17/2016 04:39 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thursday, March 17, 2016 05:35 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/16/2016 09:59 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
>>> This patch add some common code for QCA/Atheros ath79 SOCs such as
>>> DDR tuning, chip reset and CPU detection.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wills Wang <wills.wang at live.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v8:
>>> - Use setbits_be32
>>> - Use lookup-table instead of big switch statement for CPU detection
>>>
>> Good stuff, minor nits below.

[...]

>>> +phys_size_t initdram(int board_type)
>>> +{
>>> +    ddr_tap_tuning();
>> Is the DDR tap tuning needed on all AR7xxx/AR9xxx systems ?
> Yes, it's for optimizing DDR timing according to hardware.
> Sometimes, the hard code value is not ideal.

AR934x doesn't seem to need this.

>>> +    return get_ram_size((void *)KSEG1, SZ_256M);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/mach-ath79/include/mach/ar71xx_regs.h
>>> b/arch/mips/mach-ath79/include/mach/ar71xx_regs.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..893dedc
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/mach-ath79/include/mach/ar71xx_regs.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1184 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Atheros AR71XX/AR724X/AR913X SoC register definitions
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2015-2016 Wills Wang <wills.wang at live.com>
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Jaiganesh Narayanan <jnarayanan at atheros.com>
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2008-2010 Gabor Juhos <juhosg at openwrt.org>
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Imre Kaloz <kaloz at openwrt.org>
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __ASM_MACH_AR71XX_REGS_H
>>> +#define __ASM_MACH_AR71XX_REGS_H
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>> +#else
>>> +#ifndef BIT
>>> +#define BIT(nr)                 (1 << (nr))
>> This should really go into some common header.
> This header is also included by some assembly code,
> but the BIT macro in linux/bitops.h isn't compatiable with assembler.

Because of the 1UL in it ?

[...]

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list