[U-Boot] Tegra-specific header file location

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Stephen,


2016-03-31 7:48 GMT+09:00 Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>:
> Masahiro,
>
> I'm about to work on some refactoring of the Tegra-specific header files in
> U-Boot to enable support for another Tegra variant. I'd like to confirm
> where you think header files should be located before doing that.
>
> I believe you want Tegra-specific headers moved into
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/include.

Yes. I think it is better to collect SoC code into a single directory.


> That would probably be a good location for
> headers currently in arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra/. Does that sound
> correct to you?
>
> What about SoC-specific headers currently in
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegraNNN/; should they move to
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegraNNN/include?

This is up to you.
arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegraNNN/include looks good to me, though.


> A number of those header files primarily contain driver-internal definitions
> such as HW register layouts. I'd like to propose moving this private
> information into the relevant drivers/ directories where the driver
> implementation already is. There is no need to place it in an include
> directory where any C file could include it. For example, 99% of
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-tegra/tegra_mmc.h might move to
> drivers/mmc/tegra_mmc_{priv,internal}.h or even into drivers/mmc/tegra_mmc.c
> itself. The only thing that wouldn't move is the public prototype for
> pad_init_mmc(); a function the MMC driver calls and board code is expected
> to implement. I am considering making a single header that defines all those
> Tegra-specific function prototypes so we can reduce the number of header
> files too. What do you think about this.

Great idea!

Ultimately, arch/arm/mach-<soc>/include/ may go away (like Linux)
if we convert all the drivers to driver model.

Please note there is neither arch/arm/mach-uniphier/include/mach/
nor arch/arm/include/asm/arch-uniphier/.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada