[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 1/7] drivers: net: cpsw: Add reading of DT phy-handle node

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Joe
> 
> On 05/02/2016 11:08 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com> wrote:
> >> Add the ability to read the phy-handle node of the
> >> cpsw slave.  Upon reading this handle the phy-id
> >> can be stored based on the reg node in the DT.
> >>
> >> The phy-handle also needs to be stored and passed
> >> to the phy to access any phy data that is available.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v7 - Fixed checkpatch issues - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610946/
> >> Checkpatch LTL issues still remain and resolving will break readability
> >>
> >> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >> #47: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1230:
> >> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >> #50: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1233:
> > Looks like you dropped most of the Acked-by and Tested-by from the
> > last version. Please resend with those included.
> 
> Do we include the Acked-by in the patch?

So, you don't need to resend vX -> v(X+1) if the only change for the
whole series is collecting ack/tested/reviewed, patchwork does that for
us.  If you're making changes to part of a series from vX -> v(X+1) and
some areas are unchanged, yes, you should collect the previous
acked/reviewed.  I think you need to go back and see what
ack/tested/reviewed still apply and include those in v8, yes.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160502/3ceb8bbc/attachment.sig>