[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 1/7] drivers: net: cpsw: Add reading of DT phy-handle node

[Dan Murphy]

Tom

On 05/02/2016 12:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:43PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Joe
>>
>> On 05/02/2016 11:08 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Add the ability to read the phy-handle node of the
>>>> cpsw slave.  Upon reading this handle the phy-id
>>>> can be stored based on the reg node in the DT.
>>>>
>>>> The phy-handle also needs to be stored and passed
>>>> to the phy to access any phy data that is available.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v7 - Fixed checkpatch issues - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610946/
>>>> Checkpatch LTL issues still remain and resolving will break readability
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>>> #47: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1230:
>>>> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>>>> #50: FILE: drivers/net/cpsw.c:1233:
>>> Looks like you dropped most of the Acked-by and Tested-by from the
>>> last version. Please resend with those included.
>> Do we include the Acked-by in the patch?
> So, you don't need to resend vX -> v(X+1) if the only change for the
> whole series is collecting ack/tested/reviewed, patchwork does that for
> us.  If you're making changes to part of a series from vX -> v(X+1) and
> some areas are unchanged, yes, you should collect the previous
> acked/reviewed.  I think you need to go back and see what
> ack/tested/reviewed still apply and include those in v8, yes.  Thanks!
>
Do I have to up rev the series if I am just adding in acked/reviewed information?

Dan

-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy