[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] Hi all,
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Sat Nov 12 20:02:15 CET 2016
On 11/12/2016 07:53 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-11-12 00:53, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/12/2016 12:47 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> On 11.11.2016 14:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 11/11/2016 11:18 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>>>> From: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This cleans up the SPL USB Gadget Kconfig and Makfile a bit. The
>>>>> first two patches are actual fixes and we might consider to add
>>>>> them for the v2016.11 release. The third one adds a new config
>>>>> option for cleaner structure. I plan to add another USB function
>>>>> with SPL support which is the reason I looked into this...
>>>>>
>>>>> Build tested mainly with
>>>>> dra7xx_evm_defconfig (for CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT)
>>>>> and
>>>>> am335x_evm_usbspl_defconfig (for CONFIG_SPL_USBETH_SUPPORT)
>>> I am sorry, it seems I can't handle patman on friday afternoon :-) Will
>>> try to do better next time.
>>
>> No problem
>>
>>>> There are multiple issues:
>>>> 1) Would be nice if the cover letter had real Subject
>>>> 2) It's build tested on two boards, people test such disruptive changes
>>>> using buildman on at least a few architectures (arm/mips/ppc are the
>>>> usual suspects)
>>> The changes are not that disruptive as they might seem, but sure, one
>>> never knows... Note that the two boards were carefully selected: They
>>> are the _only_ ones which actually select the changed configuration
>>> options....
>>>
>>> Actually dra7xx_evm_defconfig does not even select
>>> CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT, but git log/mailing list history tells me that
>>> this is the board where that configuration has been developed with...
>>
>> OK, got it.
>>
>>>> 3) It is not acceptable as fixes for 2016.11 because it doesn't seems it
>>>> was ever boot tested
>>> I don't have any of the two boards :-(
>>>
>>> Lukasz, if you could help me out here on the dra7xx_evm I would be glad.
>>
>> So how did these fixes come to be ?
>>
>
> I rebased some patches which I plan to send upstream adding another USB
> Gadget driver in SPL. I had a hard time to include it to the build
> system the way it is now so I decided to clean it up a bit...
Ah cool, thanks for clarifying.
I'm CCing Lukasz, I'll leave the decision whether or not to apply this
stuff on him :)
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list