[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: zynq: Remove DTC 1.2 warnings

[Michal Simek]

On 15.11.2016 15:22, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 03:16:51PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 11.11.2016 18:33, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> 2016-11-11 17:04 GMT+01:00 Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:26:05PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> DTC 1.2 reports these warnings:
>>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges
>>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /pmu has a reg or ranges property,
>>>>>> but no unit name
>>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /fixedregulator at 0 has a unit name,
>>>>>> but no reg property
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch is fixing them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you addressed these in Linux as well?
>>>>
>>>> Going to do so next week.
>>>> Both should be in sync.
>>>
>>> Agreed.  I'd prefer to pull them in via Linux but at least once they're
>>> on their way into the right tree for upstream we can bring them in here
>>> as well (as I want to ensure future re-syncs are easy).  Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> I have sent them to Linux too.
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467965.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467967.html
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467968.html
> 
> OK.
> 
>> For our case we have more dtses in u-boot especially for arm64 than in
>> Linux.
> 
> Intentional or just boards that have not yet made it there?

Simply because getting these stuff to U-Boot is easier then to Linux.

>> Also u-boot,dm-pre-reloc AFAIK hasn't been validated via dt mailing
>> list. I see one thread in 2015 without any resolution.
> 
> Yes, this is something that might get a re-visit someday, but is indeed
> local to U-Boot only for now.

Adding this to chosen node with list of IPs should be IMHO reasonable
solution.

>> That's why taking stuff from Linux is sort of goal but nothing what we
>> can do without additional work.
> 
> So long as everything relevant to upstream has been posted upstream (and
> you're saying it is, so good, I'm happy) then we're in good shape here.

Trying to keep all stuff in sync as much as possible and definitely we
need to do more Linux upstreaming.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs
U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP SoCs


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20161115/a83e71c9/attachment.sig>