[U-Boot] [Resend RFC PATCH v1 0/3] GPT over MTD
Patrick DELAUNAY
patrick.delaunay at st.com
Mon Nov 28 16:02:21 CET 2016
Hi Ladislav,
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:14:22PM +0000, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> > Hi Ladislav,
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:24:39PM +0100, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a request to support GPT over MTD to be able to have
> > > > dynamic MTD informations without u-Boot
> > > environment(CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE is a
> > > > other requirement of my project).
> > >
> > > I'm just curious, could you provide some reasoning, why this is a
> > > requirement?
> >
> > One platform requirement is to boot from any supported device (NOR,
> NAND, eMMC, ...) with the same boot chain (including SPL and U-Boot)
> WITHOUT recompilation and only by changing the hardware boot
> configuration (OTP).
>
> Ok, the very same requirement here...
>
> > So I can't use environment (CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE), because I don't
> know which device is expected for tests (boot from NAND, eMMC, NOR).
> > PS: I agree that in final client board, the u-boot will be optimized and u-
> boot env could be used.
> >
> > For block device(eMMC), it is not an issue
> > - first boot stage uses the GPT header in block device, to found, load
> and execute SPL and U-Boot.
> > - U-Boot Generic Distro feature is used in U-Boot to
> > load kernel (found extlinux.conf in bootable partition)
> >
> > For Flash Device, the offset for SPL and U-Boot can't be determined easily
> by first boot stage.
>
> Offset of SPL? Isn't that determined by boot ROM code? So you actually
> cannot do much with that. What hardware are you planning to use your
> solution with?
Not necessarily, we may have a first stage boot loader (let's say ARM Trusted Firmware) loaded by the ROM code before SPL execution.
Then SPL is executed as plugin, without Flash driver only to initialize DDR (as FEL for sunxi platform or bootrom plugin for mvebu)
The HW used is a board based on the STMicroelectronics 96Board with STiH410 soc (ARM core).
> > It is why GPT is re-used to save MTD partition offset without hardcoded
> part in first boot stage or in SPL (and without U-Boot env).
> > => partition offsets are determined dynamically
>
> As SPL offset is given and only U-Boot offset can be changed (is that
> assumption right?), you can store U-Boot in UBI volume.
>
With SPL executed as plugin, U-Boot is loaded by first boot loader, which support GPT but not UBI...
> > So it should be easier to have the same behavior, based on GPT, for every
> boot device, block or flash.
> > And the same tools (programmer) or command in U-Boot will use to
> update/read every device, based on GPT header.
>
> I have to admit, that UBI solution would not let you use the same scenario for
> eMMC and NAND in terms of U-Boot commands used, but otherwise it is
> more robust.
>
> > > > The idea is to use the GPT header to save partitioning information
> > > > directly in flash device (NOR or NAND), then the MTD variables are
> > > > rebuild from these GPT partitions and can be used by DISTRO to
> > > > search
> > > bootable binary.
> > >
> > > Ok, so you stored partitioning information on flash... That seems to
> > > be some kind of limited environment saved :-)
> >
> > Yes I use standard GPT to save partitioning information, to save offset of
> MTD partition in flash device.
> > So it is limited environment :-) but limited to partition offset and it can be
> discovered dynamically by first boot stage.
>
> First boot stage is SPL here?
Not necessary, SPL is loaded and executed as plugin by first boot stage...
>
> > > > I make a first prototyping for this request but I want ask you if
> > > > this feature is acceptable for u-boot and if this patches, after
> > > > some update and cleanups, would be merged in u-boot mainline.
> > > > Do you see already some blocking points ?
> > >
> > > Is there any reason why you cannot use UBI?
> >
> > UBIFS will be used in U-Boot not in previous boot stage
>
> Just to make it completely clear: UBIFS is a filesystem used on the top of UBI
> volume...
>
> > Kernel and device tree will be found in a UBIFS volume
>
> ...so kernel and DTB are stored as a files inside UBIFS (filesystem)?
>
> Both SPL and U-Boot can load images from UBI volumes. Also you'll get
> Falcon mode for free :-)
In our case, when SPL is loaded as plugin, without file system and flash driver support, the FALCON mode is not possible :-<
The expected Flash layout is
MTD partition1 => First Boot stage (with Flash driver / GPT support)
MTD partition2 => U-Boot SPL (only DDR init)
MTD partition3 => U-Boot (UBI / UBIFS stage)
MTD partition4 => UBI (several volume : boot, kernel used by u-boot)
- First boot stage is loaded by ROM in internal RAM
- SPL is loaded as plugin to initialize DDR
- Uboot is loaded in DDR by First Boot Stage / found UBI volume
=> my issue is : how to found MTD offset if they are not hardcoded in U-Boot and First Boot Stage ?
> Best regards,
> ladis
Best Regards
Patrick
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list