[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: dts: Pine64: add Ethernet alias
Andreas Färber
afaerber at suse.de
Thu Oct 27 18:18:23 CEST 2016
Hi André,
Am 26.10.2016 um 22:50 schrieb André Przywara:
> On 26/10/16 19:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
>>> The sun8i-emac driver works fine with the A64 Ethernet IP, but we are
>>> missing an alias entry to trigger the driver instantiation by U-Boot.
>>> Add the line to point U-Boot to the Ethernet DT node.
>>> This enables TFTP boot on the Pine64.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> index d5a7249..c0fde44 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>>>
>>> aliases {
>>> serial0 = &uart0;
>>> + ethernet0 = &emac;
>>
>> Better to have this alias on sun50i-a64.dtsi since the node is defined there?
>
> Mmh, I find examples for both ways (.dtsi vs. .dts) in the kernel. I
> need to learn what's the best practice here.
Last I was told by kernel maintainers (in an Amlogic context) aliases
should be in the board's .dts[i] so that only the enabled nodes get
numbered. If they're enabled at .dtsi level then I guess nothing is
wrong with having the alias there. So I'm guessing the patch is good.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list