[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: dts: Pine64: add Ethernet alias

[Jagan Teki]

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:20 AM, André Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
> On 26/10/16 19:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
>>> The sun8i-emac driver works fine with the A64 Ethernet IP, but we are
>>> missing an alias entry to trigger the driver instantiation by U-Boot.
>>> Add the line to point U-Boot to the Ethernet DT node.
>>> This enables TFTP boot on the Pine64.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> index d5a7249..c0fde44 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-a64-pine64-common.dtsi
>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
>>>
>>>         aliases {
>>>                 serial0 = &uart0;
>>> +               ethernet0 = &emac;
>>
>> Better to have this alias on sun50i-a64.dtsi since the node is defined there?
>
> Mmh, I find examples for both ways (.dtsi vs. .dts) in the kernel. I
> need to learn what's the best practice here.
>
> But the U-Boot DTs need to get replaced anyway soon-ish, since the Linux
> DTs (which are WIP) have already diverged.
> So what about we keep this alias here next to the existing one for the
> 2016.11 release and possibly fix this later once we replace the DTs
> anyway with what gets merged into the kernel eventually?

OK, but please stick with the current discussion and still I see a
good point to see alias on dtsi because the dts files which are using
this dtsi shouldn't separately define the alias.

And also status on dtsi is showing "disabled" are you enabled it some
other patches? or missed?

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.