[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/21] sf: Adopt flash table INFO macro from Linux
Vignesh R
vigneshr at ti.com
Mon Oct 31 04:18:46 CET 2016
On Sunday 30 October 2016 11:16 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
[...]
> + {"S25FL128P_64K", INFO(0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL032P", INFO(0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL064P", INFO(0x010216, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL128S_256K", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL128S_64K", INFO(0x012018, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL256S_256K", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 128, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL256S_64K", INFO(0x010219, 0x4d01, 64 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FS512S", INFO(0x010220, 0x4D00, 128 * 1024, 512, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
> + {"S25FL512S_256K", INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL | WR_QPP) },
Could you change above S25FS512S and S25FL512S_256K to use INFO6 macro?
Right now, S25FL512S_256K gets detected as S25FS512S and sf update fails
due as erasesizes are different.
--
Regards
Vignesh
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list