[U-Boot] net: asix: Fix AX88772B when used with DriverModel

[Joe Hershberger]

Hi Marek,

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> On 09/10/2016 06:28 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2016 03:34 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 02:18 +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 01:23 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/10/2016 01:13 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 01:04 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/09/2016 11:06 PM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 13:57 -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joshua,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/666191/ was applied to
>>>>>>>>>> u-
>>>>>>>>>> boot-
>>>>>>>>>> net.git.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>> No, sorry, but this is really the wrong approach! As
>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>> rather than Joshua's patch the one from Alban should long
>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> been applied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg221455.h
>>>>>>>>> tm
>>>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will send a revert ASAP and hope Alban's patch will finally
>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>> way into master to fix this once and for all!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you, instead of sending a revert, just send a subsequent
>>>>>>>> patch to
>>>>>>>> fix this once and for all ?
>>>>>>> Sure, I will just squash my revert and Alban's fix together and
>>>>>>> send
>>>>>>> that one along ASAP.
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Don't thank me too early yet. While it works on Colibri T20 it
>>>>> currently fails on Colibri T30. More network and/or USB brokenness...
>>>>> Currently bisecting...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking care of this mess :)
>>>>>>> You are very welcome.
>>>>> How I do love U-Boot.
>>>>
>>>> And the winner is:
>>>>
>>>> commit aa7a648747d8c704a9a81c9e493d386930724e9d
>>>> Author: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
>>>> Date:   Mon Aug 15 14:42:15 2016 -0500
>>>>
>>>>     net: Stop including NFS overhead in defragment max
>>>>
>>>
>>> Uh oh, why is this aforementioned patch even correct ? And why don't we
>>> just revert it ? And why didn't anyone notice any problems with it ?
>>
>> Before that patch, on at least some platforms, lots of memory was
>> being wasted just because of trying to single-source the size of NFS
>> overhead. That patch removed that.
>>
>> The comment from that patch: "If a board needs a specific different
>> defragment size, that board can override this setting."
>>
>> That is the case here.
>
> Can we be sure that this patch will not break other board(s) ?

It will likely affect 2 other boards in the same way...

include/configs/apalis_t30.h: 56 #define CONFIG_TFTP_BLOCKSIZE           16384
include/configs/colibri_imx7.h: 49 #define CONFIG_TFTP_BLOCKSIZE           16384
include/configs/colibri_t30.h: 52 #define CONFIG_TFTP_BLOCKSIZE           16384

Cheers,
-Joe