[U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT"

[Marek Vasut]

On 09/17/2016 05:42 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:21:43PM +0100, Paul Burton wrote:
>> Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed
>> fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't
>> exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values.
>> Notably it didn't change boot_get_ramdisk, which leads to U-Boot failing
>> to boot FIT images which don't include ramdisks with the following
>> message:
>>
>>   Ramdisk image is corrupt or invalid
>>
>> The offending commit seems to dislike ENOLINK due to it not existing on
>> OpenBSD, but I'm not sure why that matters as we define it in
>> include/asm-generic/errno.h anyway so simply revert the commit to fix
>> FIT image handling.
> 
> That header is not used when building native tools.
> So reverting it will break the build of u-boot on OpenBSD.
> 
>   WRAP    tools/common/image-fit.c
>   HOSTCC  tools/common/image-fit.o
> In file included from tools/common/image-fit.c:1:
> /usr/users/jsg/src/u-boot/tools/../common/image-fit.c: In function 'fit_get_node_from_config':
> /usr/users/jsg/src/u-boot/tools/../common/image-fit.c:1569: error: 'ENOLINK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/users/jsg/src/u-boot/tools/../common/image-fit.c:1569: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /usr/users/jsg/src/u-boot/tools/../common/image-fit.c:1569: error: for each function it appears in.)
> 

I seriously do not care if it's broken on OpenBSD if there is about one
user of such system. The problem is the original patch broke booting of
fitImage-wrapped kernels and this is serious breakage which makes
2016.09 release effectively useless.

I do support this revert and we will likely need v2016.09.1 unfortunately.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut