[U-Boot] [PATCH] x86: baytrail: Add 2nd eMMC controller to the PCI probe list

[Bin Meng]

Hi Stefan,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 26.09.2016 08:33, Bin Meng wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> With this addition, the eMMC device available on the congatec and DFI
>>> BayTrail SoM is detected correctly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c | 1 +
>>>  include/pci_ids.h                  | 1 +
>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
>>> b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
>>> index b31f24e..9868de0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/valleyview.c
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>>  static struct pci_device_id mmc_supported[] = {
>>>         { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDIO },
>>>         { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VALLEYVIEW_SDCARD },
>>> +       { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_EMMC2 },
>>
>>
>> pure nits, should we use VALLEYVIEW_EMMC2? or should we change
>> previous VALLEYVIEW_SDIO/SDCARD to BYT_SDIO/SDCARD, for consistency?
>
>
> I've taken the new name from the Linux driver as you might have
> already suspected. I would prefer to change the other (old) names
> to the Linux ones. I can prepare a v2 of this patch or a follow-up
> patch for this. What would you prefer?
>

Sure, let's match Linux.

Regards,
Bin