[U-Boot] [PATCH 07/11] i2c: Drop use of CONFIG_I2C_HARD
Lokesh Vutla
lokeshvutla at ti.com
Tue Apr 25 03:03:44 UTC 2017
Hi Simon,
On Sunday 23 April 2017 09:05 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Drop use of this long-deprecated option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
> README | 16 ++++++++--------
> board/ti/am335x/board.c | 6 +-----
> board/ti/am43xx/board.c | 3 +--
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/board.c b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> index 3e842d3187..0d2e84011d 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> +++ b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> @@ -67,11 +67,7 @@ static struct ctrl_dev *cdev = (struct ctrl_dev *)CTRL_DEVICE_BASE;
> #ifdef CONFIG_TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
> void do_board_detect(void)
> {
> - enable_i2c0_pin_mux();
> - i2c_init(CONFIG_SYS_OMAP24_I2C_SPEED, CONFIG_SYS_OMAP24_I2C_SLAVE);
> -
> - if (ti_i2c_eeprom_am_get(-1, CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR))
This is very early board detection code that happens in SPL. There were
common Kconfig options added for eeprom
address(CONFIG_EEPROM_BUS_ADDRESS, CONFIG_EEPROM_CHIP_ADDRESS) but
missed updating in these boards.
Instead of removing can this be updated to
- if (ti_i2c_eeprom_am_get(-1, CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR))
+ if (ti_i2c_eeprom_am_get(CONFIG_EEPROM_BUS_ADDRESS,
+ CONFIG_EEPROM_CHIP_ADDRESS))
printf("ti_i2c_eeprom_init failed\n");
}
#endif
> - printf("ti_i2c_eeprom_init failed\n");
> + printf("ti_i2c_eeprom_init failed\n");
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/board/ti/am43xx/board.c b/board/ti/am43xx/board.c
> index 390cc168cd..a190893450 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am43xx/board.c
> +++ b/board/ti/am43xx/board.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,7 @@ static struct ctrl_dev *cdev = (struct ctrl_dev *)CTRL_DEVICE_BASE;
> #ifdef CONFIG_TI_I2C_BOARD_DETECT
> void do_board_detect(void)
> {
> - if (ti_i2c_eeprom_am_get(-1, CONFIG_SYS_I2C_EEPROM_ADDR))
> - printf("ti_i2c_eeprom_init failed\n");
> + printf("ti_i2c_eeprom_init failed\n");
> }
> #endif
Same as above.
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list