[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] This patch set represent Marvell mvpp2 driver fixes

[Joe Hershberger]

Hi Stefan (and Stefan),

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 11.07.2017 10:04, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>
>> On 21.06.2017 10:31, stefanc at malvell.com wrote:

Huh? Sent from a typo email address? That's pretty tedious. I
recommend fixing your git config. And if that's fine, I recommend
using patman so this won't happen again.

>>>
>>> From: Stefan Chulski <stefanc at marvell.com>
>>>
>>> Issues were found during internal QA phase.
>>>
>>> Stefan Chulski (10):
>>>    net: mvpp2x: Add GPIO configuration support
>>>    net: mvpp2x: fix phy connected to wrong mdio issue
>>>    net: mvpp2x: Enable GoP packet padding in TX
>>>    net: mvpp2x: fix BM configuration overrun issue
>>>    net: mvpp2x: decrease size of AGGR_TXQ and CPU_DESC_CHUNK
>>>    net: mvpp2x: remove MBUS configurations from MvPP22 driver
>>>    net: mvpp2x: Remove IRQ configuration from u-boot
>>>    net: mvpp2x: Set BM pool high address
>>>    net: mvpp2x: remove TX drain from transmit routine
>>>    net: mvpp2x: Set BM poll size once during priv probe
>>>
>>>   drivers/net/mvpp2.c | 189
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>   1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Joe, do you have any comments on these mvpp2 patches?
>
>
> Gently ping on these patches again. Joe, do you have any comments
> on these? Do you want to take these patches via your tree? Or
> should I push them if you don't have any objections?

Reviewing now. I generally use patchwork to remember what I have to
do. I guess if I didn't rely on that I would set up better work queue
email filters. Sorry for the delay.

I figured since the series is assigned to you in PW, that you wanted
it through your tree. I'm fine either way.

Cheers,
-Joe