[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 5/5] boot: fdt: fixup the memory dt nodes falcon boot
York Sun
york.sun at nxp.com
Mon Aug 28 16:47:35 UTC 2017
On 08/26/2017 04:50 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:10:51PM +0000, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 04/18/2017 04:57 AM, B, Ravi wrote:
>>>> In single stage bootmode or falcon boot mode,
>>>> the SPL shall update the memory dt nodes
>>>> spl_fixup_fdt() based on DDR configuration for
>>>> specific platform.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Babu <ravibabu at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> common/spl/spl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Clearly I am late for this thread. I only notice this change when I try
>>> to merge my FIT improvement for falcon boot.
>>>
>>> Why do we need to fixup the device tree for falcon boot at all? The
>>> device tree is static, saved as argument when exporting it, isn't it? As
>>> far as the normal boot fixes up the device tree, the exported device
>>> tree is correct.
>>
>> So, the further argument here is that if you have to edit the dts to
>> include a valid amount of memory so that the dtb the kernel spits out is
>> useful in falcon mode, it's not at all useful in development.
>
> Anyone noticed! this change is breaking falcon mode (tried in i.MX6
> and rk3288) even if we forcibly disable CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT the SPL
> need to revert back to use SPL_OF_PLATDATA.
>
It broke falcon boot for ls1043ardb and ls1043ardb (and probably all my
ARMv8 platforms) due to the way we reserve secure memory. I have added a
patch (not upstreamed yet) to prevent dram_init_banksize() to run twice
for my boards.
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list