[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure

[York Sun]

On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson at nxp.com> wrote:
>> Hi York,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: York Sun
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 12:00 AM
>>> To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>> Cc: Anji Jagarlmudi <anji.jagarlmudi at nxp.com>; Joe Hershberger
>>> <joe.hershberger at ni.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
>>> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure
>>>
>>> On 11/21/2017 10:26 PM, Calvin Johnson wrote:
>>>> This patch series fixes bug which fails tftp sometimes
>>>> while using the pfe interfaces and also has some code clean up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Calvin Johnson (3):
>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: add pfe_rx_done to clear bd after packet
>>>>     processing
>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: use writel/readl to access hw bds
>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: cleanup typos and indent
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> -----------
>>>>  drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_eth.c    |  13 ++--
>>>>  include/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.h     |   1 +
>>>>  3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your PFE patch set is not fully reviewed or accepted. If I were you, I
>>> would probably send v2 version to include all the changes.
>>>
>>> It is up to Joe to decide to take a new version, or patches on top of
>>> patches.
> 
> It's assigned to York in patchwork. would you prefer I take them?
>

Yes, please.
I also advised Calvin to squash his patches into one set, instead of
patching the patches.

York