[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure

[Joe Hershberger]

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:57 PM, York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2017 12:50 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson at nxp.com> wrote:
>>> Hi York,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: York Sun
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 12:00 AM
>>>> To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>>> Cc: Anji Jagarlmudi <anji.jagarlmudi at nxp.com>; Joe Hershberger
>>>> <joe.hershberger at ni.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
>>>> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure
>>>>
>>>> On 11/21/2017 10:26 PM, Calvin Johnson wrote:
>>>>> This patch series fixes bug which fails tftp sometimes
>>>>> while using the pfe interfaces and also has some code clean up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Calvin Johnson (3):
>>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: add pfe_rx_done to clear bd after packet
>>>>>     processing
>>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: use writel/readl to access hw bds
>>>>>   drivers: net: pfe_eth: cleanup typos and indent
>>>>>
>>>>>  drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>> -----------
>>>>>  drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_eth.c    |  13 ++--
>>>>>  include/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.h     |   1 +
>>>>>  3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your PFE patch set is not fully reviewed or accepted. If I were you, I
>>>> would probably send v2 version to include all the changes.
>>>>
>>>> It is up to Joe to decide to take a new version, or patches on top of
>>>> patches.
>>
>> It's assigned to York in patchwork. would you prefer I take them?
>>
>
> Yes, please.
> I also advised Calvin to squash his patches into one set, instead of
> patching the patches.

Ah - I didn't realize this wasn't already in. I see that now.

Yes, I'll review those patches and they should be squashed and resent.

Thank,
-Joe