[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] doc: FIT image: fix incorrect description of DT node unit address
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Dec 19 04:24:30 UTC 2017
On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
> The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg"
> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
> not the case.
> Fix all occurences in the FIT image documentation files where this was not
> observed, to not give bad examples to the reader.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> ---
> doc/uImage.FIT/beaglebone_vboot.txt | 84 +++++++++++-----------
> doc/uImage.FIT/command_syntax_extensions.txt | 42 +++++------
> doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt | 52 +++++++-------
> doc/uImage.FIT/overlay-fdt-boot.txt | 78 ++++++++++-----------
> doc/uImage.FIT/signature.txt | 100 +++++++++++++--------------
> doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt | 26 +++----
> doc/uImage.FIT/x86-fit-boot.txt | 10 +--
> 7 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
I'm not hugely keen on the inconsistency of kernel vs. hash at 1, but I
suppose it does not matter.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list