[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/7] doc: FIT image: fix incorrect description of DT node unit address

[Simon Glass]

On 18 December 2017 at 21:24, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
>> The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg"
>> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
>> not the case.
>> Fix all occurences in the FIT image documentation files where this was not
>> observed, to not give bad examples to the reader.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/beaglebone_vboot.txt          |  84 +++++++++++-----------
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/command_syntax_extensions.txt |  42 +++++------
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt                     |  52 +++++++-------
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/overlay-fdt-boot.txt          |  78 ++++++++++-----------
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/signature.txt                 | 100 +++++++++++++--------------
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt        |  26 +++----
>>  doc/uImage.FIT/x86-fit-boot.txt              |  10 +--
>>  7 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>
> I'm not hugely keen on the inconsistency of kernel vs. hash at 1, but I
> suppose it does not matter.

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!