[U-Boot] [PATCH] rockchip: firefly: configs: remove config_spl_of_platdata

Jacob Chen jacobchen110 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 10:28:12 UTC 2017


Hi,

2017-02-17 4:44 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 February 2017 at 23:41, Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kever,
>>
>>
>> Kever Yang wrote on 2017年02月15日 14:13:
>>>
>>> Hi Jacob,
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2017 11:06 AM, Jacob Chen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We should remove config_spl_of_platdata to build u-boot-spl-dtb.bin
>>>> rather than u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin
>>>> since we use spl_back_to_brom.
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you try with CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA on and without SPL_BACK_TO_BROM?
>>>
>>> If this works on firefly, then we can still leave it as an example to show
>>> how both way works.
>>>
>>
>> Firefly had been using CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA and it works well.
>> Just it will make trouble for other things to generate the u-boot blob,
>> like yocto, sdk build scripts, guides...
>>
>> At first, I also want to keep  CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA in firefly, but later
>> I find that i have to do a lot of unnecessary work to deal with it,
>> so now I would like one chip use one way to generate the u-boot blob.
>
> How about having a separate board config like firefly-rk3288-dt so
> that we keep the non-of-platdata alive? It only needs a separate
> defconfig, which is pretty esay.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


I send a  patch "rockchip: firefly: configs: add a new config to keep
non-of-platdata" to save old config.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list