[U-Boot] [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] spi: cadence_qspi_apb: Use 32 bit indirect write transaction when possible
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Wed Jan 4 18:20:53 CET 2017
On 01/04/2017 05:54 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> On 01/04/2017 05:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2017 04:53 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday 03 January 2017 07:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:35 PM, R, Vignesh <vigneshr at ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/21/2016 10:42 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>>>>>>>> According to Section 11.15.4.9.2 Indirect Write Controller of K2G SoC
>>>>>>>>> TRM SPRUHY8D[1], the external master is only permitted to issue 32-bit
>>>>>>>>> data interface writes until the last word of an indirect transfer
>>>>>>>>> otherwise indirect writes is known to fails sometimes. So, make sure
>>>>>>>>> that QSPI indirect writes are 32 bit sized except for the last write. If
>>>>>>>>> the txbuf is unaligned then use bounce buffer to avoid data aborts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, now that the driver uses bounce_buffer, enable CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER
>>>>>>>>> for all boards that use Cadence QSPI driver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhy8d/spruhy8d.pdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gentle ping on the series...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please link to other one, I couldn't find it on patchwork.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the two patches of the series:
>>>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/707648/
>>>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/707647/
>>>>>
>>>>> Applied to u-boot-spi/master
>>>>
>>>> I believe you mean next, right ?
>>>
>>> master, Since the patch thread start before MW
>>>
>> I just hope you don't plan to push this into 2017.01 ...
>
> I already send PR for these, since these were sitting so-long. any issues?
>
Hm, let's see, the release is in 5 days and this affects multiple boards
from different SoC vendors. Therefore, there will likely be
no testing of this patchset and we will find latent bugs only after
release, when they cannot be fixed anymore. There is a reason for
those multiple RC cycles ...
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list