[U-Boot] [v3, 1/3] mmc: fsl_esdhc: move 'status' property fixup into a weak function
york sun
york.sun at nxp.com
Thu Jan 12 18:08:50 CET 2017
On 01/11/2017 05:42 PM, Y.B. Lu wrote:
> Hi York,
>
> Any comments on this patchset?
> Thanks a lot.
You didn't CC me for this set. I didn't notice them in the list. See
comment below.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yangbo Lu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yangbo Lu [mailto:yangbo.lu at nxp.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:42 AM
>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Cc: york sun; Y.B. Lu
>> Subject: [v3, 1/3] mmc: fsl_esdhc: move 'status' property fixup into a
>> weak function
>>
>> Move fdt fixup of 'status' property into a weak function. This allows
>> board to define 'status' fdt fixup by themselves.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu at nxp.com>
>> ---
>> Changes for v2:
>> - None
>> Changes for v3:
>> - None
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c index
>> 9796d39..68de04e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c
>> @@ -908,17 +908,26 @@ void mmc_adapter_card_type_ident(void) #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT
>> -void fdt_fixup_esdhc(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
>> +__weak int esdhc_status_fixup(void *blob, const char *compat)
>> {
>> - const char *compat = "fsl,esdhc";
>> -
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC_PIN_MUX
>> if (!hwconfig("esdhc")) {
>> do_fixup_by_compat(blob, compat, "status", "disabled",
>> - 8 + 1, 1);
>> - return;
>> + sizeof("disabled"), 1);
>> + return 1;
What's your intention for the non-zero return? It is not considered an
error, is it?
>> }
>> #endif
>> + do_fixup_by_compat(blob, compat, "status", "okay",
>> + sizeof("okay"), 1);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void fdt_fixup_esdhc(void *blob, bd_t *bd) {
>> + const char *compat = "fsl,esdhc";
>> +
>> + if (esdhc_status_fixup(blob, compat))
>> + return;
With non-zero return, following code will be skipped. This is the same
as code flow before this change. What are you going to do with the new
board-level function?
Review comment continues on other patches in this set.
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list