[U-Boot] u-boot.git or u-boot-x86.git for x86_64 u-boots?

[Simon Glass]

Hi Joakim,

On 15 January 2017 at 09:49, Joakim Tjernlund
<Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Joakim,
>>
>> On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +Simon,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> > <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote:
>> > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use?
>> > >
>> >
>> > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet.
>>
>> I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete.
>> Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing,
>> graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux!
>
> Great, getting closer every day.
> Any idea for how much is missing in u-boot to bring up a
> Rangeley(C2758), no graphics required. Need networking, rs232, USB and maybe SATA.

If it uses an FSP then it probably isn't much work to get it running
with 32-bit U-Boot. Bin is the expert here.

For 64-bit, we have quite a few things to do. But note that 32-bit
U-Boot can directly boot both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. It does not
have the 'UEFI' restriction of having to select your boot loader based
on your kernel.

Regards,
Simon