[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] configs: dra7xx_evm: am57xx_evm: Enable DM_REGULATOR_PBIAS

Jean-Jacques Hiblot jjhiblot at ti.com
Thu Jul 13 14:06:03 UTC 2017



On 13/07/2017 15:45, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
> On 7/13/2017 5:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:18:43AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/12/2017 11:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:16:27PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/12/2017 3:25 PM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>>>>>> This regulator is used for voltage switching on MMC1 IO lines.
>>>>> Can you enable on HS platforms as well.
>>>> Is this a SoC thing (which includes a strongly encouraged to use in
>>>> designs) or a board choice (you really can expect to find custom boards
>>>> that wouldn't want this) ?  I'm asking because it sounds like perhaps we
>>>> should be imply'ing somewhere instead so that HS and EVM and custom
>>>> boards are in sync.  Thanks!
>>> Regulators are a board choice. Yes, that makes sense. These can be
>>> implied for TARGET_DRA7XX_EVM.
>> And that's really true?  I ask since I recall there's some SoCs where
>> it's a lot more theoretical than practical to have a PMIC other than the
> Well, it is still possible to use a different PMIC and I guess it is
> better to stick it that way.
PBIAS is not board specific, it's in the SOC. I should probably make the 
hsmmc select it automatically when using DM_MMC and DM_REGULATOR.
>
>> one the EVM uses.  But, yes, board level imply is the way to go then.
>> The rule of thumb should be that if it's not really optional, the board
>> or SoC should imply it if there's a reason to not have it, or select it
>> if it's required.
>>
> Jean,
> 	Can you repost the patch as Tom suggested?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Lokesh
>
>



More information about the U-Boot mailing list