[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/34] env: Move environment code to use location drivers
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Tue Jul 25 21:40:42 UTC 2017
Hi Tom,
On 25 July 2017 at 11:49, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 09:19:35PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > The environment code is ripe for improvement in various ways. It has lots
> > of duplication and inconsistencies between how things work with different
> > environment locations. It does not properly use Kconfig. Error checking
> > and handling is patchy.
> >
> > This series makes a start at improving things:
> >
> > - moves the rest of the CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_... options to Kconfig
>
> I would like to see just this part first, by itself, so we can be sure
> it's right. I took a quick stab at trying this, and here's a few
> things:
> - The freescale SECURE_BOOT boards aren't right.
> board/freescale/common/Kconfig must have it select ENV_IS_NOWHERE and
> the other options must depend on !CHAIN_OF_TRUST.
> - Patch 3 seem to, due to moving things slightly, cause tiny size
> changes. On balance, this is fine. But in terms of "did Kconfig
> migration happen correctly" it is not, since it makes it easier for
> something to slip past.
>
> So, I'm going to grab and update the migration portions of this series
> and have them as a zero size (aside from boards with CMD_CONFIG on)
> change, hopefully shortly. And then we can still take in the rest of
> this series, after comments, this release. Sound good? Thanks!
>
I was unable to make this series avoid effective CONFIG changes as in
some cases the environment is in one place in SPL (e.g.
ENV_IS_NOWHERE) and another in U-Boot proper. I assumed that this was
just going to have to be resolved by maintainers if it is a problem.
Anyway please do whatever you wish and I can rebase the other patches
afterwards. We have time for people to chime in and adjust things
later.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list