[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: dts: skeleton: fix unit name warning from dtc
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Mar 13 13:24:14 UTC 2017
Hi,
On 13 March 2017 at 03:00, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
> 2017-03-13 16:53 GMT+09:00 Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang at atmel.com>:
>> Fix the following warning from dtc by adding the unit name for
>> the memory node.
>> ---8<---
>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
>> ---<8---
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang at atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
>> index b41d241de2..a20da0a7a6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
>> @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> chosen { };
>> aliases { };
>> - memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
>> + memory at 0 { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
>> };
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
>
>
>
> As far as I can tell, the DT community decided to
> deprecate skeleton.dtsi (and people are fixing DT files
> to not include it).
>
>
>
> commit 9c0da3cc61f1233c2782e2d3d91e3d0707dd4ba5
> Author: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Date: Fri Sep 2 17:34:50 2016 +0100
>
> ARM: dts: explicitly mark skeleton.dtsi as deprecated
>
> As noted in commit 3ebee5a2e141496b ("arm64: dts: kill skeleton.dtsi"),
> there are a number of problems with skeleton.dtsi, and it would be
> prefereable to remove it entirely. As there are a large number of
> existing users, fixing these up will take a while.
>
> This patch adds a note to arm's skeleton.dtsi noting that this is the
> case, to make this more obvious and hopefully minimize new uptake of
> skeleton.dtsi in the mean time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>
>
OK so perhaps a patch to mark it deprecated, and a patch to remove it
from the Atmel boards would be better?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list