[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] armv7m: add instruction & data cache support

Vikas Manocha vikas.manocha at st.com
Fri Mar 17 19:02:37 UTC 2017


Thanks Simon,

On 03/16/2017 03:06 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Vikas,
> 
> On 14 March 2017 at 11:27, Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha at st.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds armv7m instruction & data cache support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha at st.com>
>> cc: Christophe KERELLO <christophe.kerello at st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changed in v3:
>> - uint32 replcaed with u32.
>> - multiple read of hardware register replaced with single.
>> - pointers replaced with macros for base address.
>> - register names added as comment for system control block registers.
>>
>> Changed in v2:
>> - changed strucures for memory mapped cache registers to macros
>> - added lines better readability.
>> - replaced magic numbers with macros.
>>
>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile  |   2 +-
>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c   | 291 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/armv7m.h |  26 +++-
>>  arch/arm/lib/Makefile         |   2 +
>>  4 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>> index aff60e8..41efe11 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@
>>  #
>>
>>  extra-y := start.o
>> -obj-y += cpu.o
>> +obj-y += cpu.o cache.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9021525
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
>> +/*
>> + * (C) Copyright 2017
>> + * Vikas Manocha, ST Micoelectronics, vikas.manocha at st.com.
>> + *
>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier:    GPL-2.0+
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <common.h>
>> +#include <asm/armv7m.h>
>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <errno.h>
> 
> put this one below common.h

oh yes, ok.

> 
>> +
>> +/* Cache maintenance operation registers */
>> +
>> +#define IC_IALLU               (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x00)
>> +#define INVAL_ICACHE_POU       0
>> +#define IC_IMVALU              (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x08)
>> +#define DC_IMVAC               (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x0C)
>> +#define DC_ISW                 (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x10)
>> +#define DC_CMVAU               (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x14)
>> +#define DC_CMVAC               (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x18)
>> +#define DC_CSW                 (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x1C)
>> +#define DC_CIMVAC              (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x20)
>> +#define DC_CISW                        (V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x24)
>> +#define WAYS_SHIFT             30
>> +#define SETS_SHIFT             5
>> +
>> +/* armv7m processor feature registers */
>> +
>> +#define CLIDR                  (V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x00)
>> +#define CTR                    (V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x04)
>> +#define CCSIDR                 (V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x08)
>> +#define MASK_NUM_WAYS          GENMASK(12, 3)
>> +#define MASK_NUM_SETS          GENMASK(27, 13)
>> +#define CLINE_SIZE_MASK                GENMASK(2, 0)
>> +#define NUM_WAYS_SHIFT         3
>> +#define NUM_SETS_SHIFT         13
>> +#define CSSELR                 (V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x0C)
>> +#define SEL_I_OR_D             BIT(0)
>> +
>> +enum cache_type {
>> +       DCACHE = 0,
> 
> Do you need the =0 ?

No :-), thanks.

> 
>> +       ICACHE,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* PoU : Point of Unification, Poc: Point of Coherency */
>> +enum cache_action {
>> +       INVALIDATE_POU,         /* for i-cache invalidate by address */
>> +       INVALIDATE_POC,         /* for d-cache invalidate by address */
>> +       INVALIDATE_SET_WAY,     /* for d-cache invalidate by sets/ways */
>> +       FLUSH_POU,
>> +       FLUSH_POC,
>> +       FLUSH_SET_WAY,
>> +       FLUSH_INVAL_POC,
>> +       FLUSH_INVAL_SET_WAY,
> 
> Can you add comments for the rest?

sure.

> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF
>> +struct dcache_config {
>> +       u32 ways;
>> +       u32 sets;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void get_cache_ways_sets(struct dcache_config *cache)
>> +{
>> +       u32 cache_size_id = readl(CCSIDR);
> 
> blank line here

ok.

> 
>> +       cache->ways = (cache_size_id & MASK_NUM_WAYS) >> NUM_WAYS_SHIFT;
>> +       cache->sets = (cache_size_id & MASK_NUM_SETS) >> NUM_SETS_SHIFT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 *get_action_reg_set_ways(enum cache_action action)
> 
> Can you please add a function comment? What does this return?

this function returns the io register to perform required cache action like clean or clean & invalidate
by sets/ways. The procedure to perform on these io register is same for cleaning & clean/invalidate.

I will add the comment in code.

> 
>> +{
>> +       switch (action) {
>> +       case INVALIDATE_SET_WAY:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_ISW;
> 
> Can you drop these casts by using a C structure or by putting thecast
> in the #define?

C structures was the first choice but they were removed after v1 as per review comment & replaced with #defines.
ok for the casting in #defines.

> 
>> +       case FLUSH_SET_WAY:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_CSW;
>> +       case FLUSH_INVAL_SET_WAY:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_CISW;
>> +       default:
>> +               break;
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 *get_action_reg_range(enum cache_action action)
>> +{
>> +       switch (action) {
>> +       case INVALIDATE_POU:
>> +               return (u32 *)IC_IMVALU;
>> +       case INVALIDATE_POC:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_IMVAC;
>> +       case FLUSH_POU:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_CMVAU;
>> +       case FLUSH_POC:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_CMVAC;
>> +       case FLUSH_INVAL_POC:
>> +               return (u32 *)DC_CIMVAC;
>> +       default:
>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 get_cline_size(enum cache_type type)
> 
> Why u32? Should it be uint or ulong?

armv7m is 32bit arch, cacheline size (32 bytes for cortex M7) can never be more than u32.
Please let me know if i am missing something.

> 
>> +{
>> +       u32 size;
>> +
>> +       if (type == DCACHE)
>> +               clrbits_le32(CSSELR, BIT(SEL_I_OR_D));
>> +       else if (type == ICACHE)
>> +               setbits_le32(CSSELR, BIT(SEL_I_OR_D));
>> +       dsb();
>> +
>> +       size = readl(CCSIDR) & CLINE_SIZE_MASK;
>> +       /* Size enocoded as 2 less than log(no_of_words_in_cache_line) base 2 */
>> +       size = 1 << (size + 2);
>> +       debug("cache line size is %d\n", size);
>> +
>> +       return size;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __attribute__((unused)) int action_cache_range(enum cache_action action,
>> +                    u32 start_addr, int64_t size)
> 
> Function comment.

this function is to perform the required action like invalidate/clean on a range of cache addresses.
I will add comment.

> 
> Can you use __used ?

I figured these attribute will not be required after using the cache prototypes of common.h like 
invalidate_dcache_range().

> 
>> +{
>> +       u32 cline_size;
>> +       u32 *action_reg;
>> +       enum cache_type type;
>> +
>> +       action_reg = get_action_reg_range(action);
>> +       if (!action_reg)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +       if (action == INVALIDATE_POU)
>> +               type = ICACHE;
>> +       else
>> +               type = DCACHE;
>> +
>> +       /* Cache line size is minium size for the cache action */
>> +       cline_size = get_cline_size(type);
>> +       /* Align start address to cache line boundary */
>> +       start_addr &= ~(cline_size - 1);
>> +       do {
>> +               writel(start_addr, action_reg);
>> +               size -= cline_size;
>> +               start_addr += cline_size;
>> +       } while (size > cline_size);
>> +       dsb();
>> +       isb();
>> +       debug("cache action on range done\n");
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int action_dcache_all(enum cache_action action)
> 
> Function comment.

this function is to perform the required action like invalidate/clean on all cached addresses.
I will add comment for it.

Cheers,
Vikas

> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> .
> 


More information about the U-Boot mailing list