[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] board/BuR/common: incorrect check of dtb

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

The logical expression to check the dtb is incorrect in
load_devicetree.

The problem was indicated by cppcheck.

The inconsistent variable name dtppart is changed to dtbpart.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
---
v2:
  fix syntax error due to incorrect spelling of variable

  Building was checked with buildman

  $ buildman -k brxre1
  boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do.
  Building current source for 1 boards (1 thread, 4 jobs per thread)
      1    0    0 /1      brxre1     
  $ buildman -k brppt1
  boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do.
  Building current source for 3 boards (3 threads, 2 jobs per thread)
      3    0    0 /3      0:00:45  : brppt1_nand

  I do not have a BuR board available for actual testing.

v1:
  Original patch
  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/758237/
---
 board/BuR/common/common.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/BuR/common/common.c b/board/BuR/common/common.c
index 876150402c..5cc82c9473 100644
--- a/board/BuR/common/common.c
+++ b/board/BuR/common/common.c
@@ -264,13 +264,13 @@ static int load_devicetree(void)
 #else
 	char *dtbname = getenv("dtb");
 	char *dtbdev = getenv("dtbdev");
-	char *dtppart = getenv("dtbpart");
-	if (!dtbdev || !dtbdev || !dtbname) {
+	char *dtbpart = getenv("dtbpart");
+	if (!dtbdev || !dtbpart || !dtbname) {
 		printf("%s: <dtbdev>/<dtbpart>/<dtb> missing.\n", __func__);
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (fs_set_blk_dev(dtbdev, dtppart, FS_TYPE_EXT)) {
+	if (fs_set_blk_dev(dtbdev, dtbpart, FS_TYPE_EXT)) {
 		puts("load_devicetree: set_blk_dev failed.\n");
 		return -1;
 	}
-- 
2.11.0