[U-Boot] [U-Boot, v5, 12/18] arm: mark save_boot_params_ret as a function

[Philipp Tomsich]

> As no '.type' was set for save_boot_params_ret in start.S, binutils
> did not track whether it was emitted as A32 or T32.  By properly
> marking save_boot_params_ret as a potential function entry, we can
> make sure that the compiler will insert the appropriate instructions
> for branching to save_boot_params_ret both for call-sites emitted as
> A32 and T32.
> 
> Reported-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan at rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com>
> Tested-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan at rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v5: None
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3:
> - tracked the root-cause why no interwork branch was emitted and fixed
>   it using a '.type'-directive in start.S to mark save_boot_params_ret
>   as a (possible) function-entry.
> 
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 

Applied to u-boot-rockchip/next, thanks!