[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] ubifs: avoid possible NULL dereference

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Wed Nov 22 08:09:36 UTC 2017


Dear Ladislav,

In message <20171121212222.ryicwv6tyh5rye2e at lenoch> you wrote:
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.c b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.c
> > > index 4465523d5f..313dee0579 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.c
> > > @@ -403,8 +403,7 @@ static int ubifs_finddir(struct super_block *sb, char *dirname,
> > >  	dir = kzalloc(sizeof(struct inode), 0);
> > >  	if (!file || !dentry || !dir) {
> > >  		printf("%s: Error, no memory for malloc!\n", __func__);
> > > -		err = -ENOMEM;
> > > -		goto out;
> > > +		goto out_nomem;
> > >  	}
...
> > Should you not keep the "err = -ENOMEM;" setting?  Otherwise there
> > is no indivcation that an error happened.
> 
> It is not obvious from the patch, but value of err is later discarded.
> It serves sole purpose of printing debug notice.

So apparently we have a number of places in U-Boot where fatal
errors (running out of memory) are just ignored and we continue as
if nothing happened?

THis is short-sighted at best. One day Pump Six will fail.

This is giving me the creepes. 

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Why don't you have a Linux partition installed so you can be  working
in  a  programmer-friendly environment instead of a keep-gates'-bank-
account-happy one? :-)                            -- Tom Christiansen


More information about the U-Boot mailing list