[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure
Calvin Johnson
calvin.johnson at nxp.com
Thu Nov 23 01:17:46 UTC 2017
Hi York,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: York Sun
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 12:00 AM
> To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Anji Jagarlmudi <anji.jagarlmudi at nxp.com>; Joe Hershberger
> <joe.hershberger at ni.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure
>
> On 11/21/2017 10:26 PM, Calvin Johnson wrote:
> > This patch series fixes bug which fails tftp sometimes
> > while using the pfe interfaces and also has some code clean up.
> >
> >
> > Calvin Johnson (3):
> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: add pfe_rx_done to clear bd after packet
> > processing
> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: use writel/readl to access hw bds
> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: cleanup typos and indent
> >
> > drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> -----------
> > drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_eth.c | 13 ++--
> > include/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Your PFE patch set is not fully reviewed or accepted. If I were you, I
> would probably send v2 version to include all the changes.
>
> It is up to Joe to decide to take a new version, or patches on top of
> patches.
I can squash all these follow up patches to v2 of the base pfe patch series.
Yes, it will be better than having these patches on top of it as the base is not yet merged.
Thanks
Calvin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list