[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: ram: rk3399: update reg map for of-platdata

Dr. Philipp Tomsich philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com
Thu Sep 7 08:51:45 UTC 2017


Kever,

Thanks for the fix.

Could we move all RK3399 boards to use OF_CONTROL (i.e. not OF_PLATDATA)
in SPL?  We have been using this for the RK3399-Q7 and there is plenty of SRAM
left for future code-growth, so this should be a safe choice.

Regards,
Philipp.

> On 7 Sep 2017, at 05:20, Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
> 
> After Simon's patch, the dtoc can work with 64bit address,
> so we need to fix reg number for it.
> Depend on Simon's patch set:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/807266/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>

Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com>

> ---
> 
> drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
> index 63342ab..5ed4b03 100644
> --- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
> +++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
> @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int conv_of_platdata(struct udevice *dev)
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	ret = regmap_init_mem_platdata(dev, dtplat->reg,
> -			ARRAY_SIZE(dtplat->reg) / 4,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(dtplat->reg) / 2,
> 			&plat->map);
> 	if (ret)
> 		return ret;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 



More information about the U-Boot mailing list