[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH 0/6] rockchip: enable live tree on the RK3399 and validate on the RK3399-Q7
Dr. Philipp Tomsich
philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com
Wed Sep 13 09:48:41 UTC 2017
> On 13 Sep 2017, at 11:47, Dr. Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Sep 2017, at 11:42, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/12/2017 05:32 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>> This series repeats the same exercise as for the RK3368 and adapts any
>>> lingering dependencies necessary to move the RK3399-based boards over
>>> to use a live tree. Validated on the RK3399-Q7 (Puma).
>>>
>>> Resent, due to an apparent patchworks hick-up yesterday that "ate my series".
>>>
>>>
>>> Philipp Tomsich (6):
>>> rockchip: clk: rk3399: Convert to livetree
>>> rockchip: xhci: Convert to livetree
>>> rockchip: efuse: change to use dev_read_addr_ptr
>>> usb: dwc2: convert to livetree
>>> usb: host: ehci-generic: convert to livetree
>>> rockchip: defconfig: puma-rk3399: enable OF_LIVE (live tree)
>>
>> So how are these patches dependent on one another ? They look like
>> mostly separate patches to me. I certainly cannot take the whole
>> patchset through -usb ...
>
> These are all dependencies to move RK3399 boards to OF_LIVE.
>
> We have two options:
> (a) keep them together and I move them through u-boot-rockchip after
> you send a review for the usb-related patches
> (b) I split the series, but then the usb-related changes are left dangling
> as there won’t be a clear indication how this was tested and what
> context these came from.
>
> Either approach is fine with me.
I just realised that the entire series has been delegated to me in Patchwork
anyway, so it seems as if option (a) would be the “default choice” …
Regards,
Philipp.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list