[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH 0/6] rockchip: enable live tree on the RK3399 and validate on the RK3399-Q7

[Dr. Philipp Tomsich]

> On 13 Sep 2017, at 11:49, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 09/13/2017 11:47 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> 
>>> On 13 Sep 2017, at 11:42, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 09/12/2017 05:32 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>>> This series repeats the same exercise as for the RK3368 and adapts any
>>>> lingering dependencies necessary to move the RK3399-based boards over
>>>> to use a live tree.  Validated on the RK3399-Q7 (Puma).
>>>> 
>>>> Resent, due to an apparent patchworks hick-up yesterday that "ate my series".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Philipp Tomsich (6):
>>>> rockchip: clk: rk3399: Convert to livetree
>>>> rockchip: xhci: Convert to livetree
>>>> rockchip: efuse: change to use dev_read_addr_ptr
>>>> usb: dwc2: convert to livetree
>>>> usb: host: ehci-generic: convert to livetree
>>>> rockchip: defconfig: puma-rk3399: enable OF_LIVE (live tree)
>>> 
>>> So how are these patches dependent on one another ? They look like
>>> mostly separate patches to me. I certainly cannot take the whole
>>> patchset through -usb ...
>> 
>> These are all dependencies to move RK3399 boards to OF_LIVE.
>> 
>> We have two options:
>> (a)	keep them together and I move them through u-boot-rockchip after
>> 	you send a review for the usb-related patches
>> (b)	I split the series, but then the usb-related changes are left dangling
>> 	as there won’t be a clear indication how this was tested and what
>> 	context these came from.
>> 
>> Either approach is fine with me.
> 
> Since some of this is core USB stuff, it should go through -usb , that's
> what the subsystem trees are for. I also don't see any problem with
> pulling the USB ones in separately, they do not seem to depend on
> anything else in that series.

Just ACK those that you’ll take and I’ll try not to step on your toes when
handling the remainder of the series. 

Regards,
Philipp.