[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/14] uboot overlays, FIT image & unittest

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:03:38PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:53:17PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Pantelis,
> > 
> > On 4 September 2017 at 14:12, Pantelis Antoniou
> > <pantelis.antoniou at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > This patchset allows uboot to handle overlays in a manner that uses
> > > a base DT blob and an arbitrary number of DT overlays blobs.
> > >
> > > While it is intended to be used with FIT images since handling a multitude
> > > of device tree blobs manually is a chore, manual fdt overlay application
> > > is supported and described.
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > * Addressed review comments by splitting patches and documenting methods.
> > > * Patch preserving extra configuration on fit-load
> > >
> > > The patchset is available at
> > >
> > >         https://github.com/pantoniou/u-boot/tree/uboot-overlays
> > >
> > > and is against mainline u-boot as pulled today, 4/9/2017.
> > >
> > > Franklin S Cooper Jr (1):
> > >   doc: overlays: Tweak documentation regarding overlays
> > >
> > > Pantelis Antoniou (13):
> > >   Introduce fdt_setprop_placeholder() method
> > >   fdt: Introduce helper method fdt_overlay_apply_verbose()
> > >   fdt: Switch to using the verbose overlay application method
> > >   fdt: Allow stacked overlays phandle references
> > >   fit: Allow multiple images per property
> > >   fit: Do not throw away extra configuration on fit_image_load()
> > >   fit: Introduce methods for applying overlays on fit-load
> > >   fit: fdt overlays doc
> > >   doc: Document how to apply fdt overlays
> > >   dtbo: make dtbos special
> > >   config: sandbox: Add unit tests
> > >   ut: fix fdt_getprop_u32() change
> > >   test: overlay: Add unit test for stacked overlay
> > 
> > I applied this series (to u-boot-fdt/testing) but it requires a later
> > version of dtc than we use in our travis tests:
> > 
> > https://travis-ci.org/sglass68/u-boot/jobs/275239527
> 
> The -@ flag has been around for a long time, relatively speaking.  Is
> there a problem in our .travis.yml perhaps where it's not picking up the
> dtc we're building from git?

Yeah, it's not:
https://travis-ci.org/trini/u-boot/builds/275424745

I bet this got broken recently too, I'll see what we need to fix in the
travis environment.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170914/28e850ff/attachment.sig>