[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: Add migration plan for CONFIG_BLK

Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Mon Apr 2 04:57:02 UTC 2018


On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:13 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at google.com> wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 28 March 2018 at 02:04, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 9:57 PM,  <sjg at google.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 7 August 2017 at 09:39, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:45:53PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The CONFIG_BLK conversion involves quite invasive changes in the U-Boot
>>>>> code, with #ifdefs and different code paths. We should try to move over to
>>>>> this soon so we can drop the old code.
>>
>> I hope this will applicable to SPL too?
>>
>> If so, we are having SPL size issues with few Allwinner families, if
>> enable SPL_DM any suggestions?
>
> I don't think we can require BLK for SPL / TPL, or even DM for that
> matter. We should use it when size permits.

But we can still maintain non-dm code in driver with #ifdef right?
indeed migration plan is to remove that.

Jagan.

-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list