[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-dm

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On 4 February 2018 at 02:13, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 10:12:41AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 26 January 2018 at 17:50, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:45:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> Here are some additions to logging and 64-bit sandbox support.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The following changes since commit ab12aa24e619b5e81cbde7de88c6d9a19f04313b:
>> >>
>> >>   ARM: socfpga: Convert callers of cm_write_with_phase for
>> >> wait_for_bit_le32 (2018-01-26 13:08:03 -0500)
>> >>
>> >> are available in the Git repository at:
>> >>
>> >>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm.git
>> >>
>> >> for you to fetch changes up to 4e94617bf911595efcecf52d6c9f323744a81cda:
>> >>
>> >>   log: add category LOGC_EFI (2018-01-26 12:20:55 -0700)
>> >>
>> >
>> > NAK:
>> > Starting LLVM-3.8 test
>> > common/log.c:44:17: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum log_category_t' to different enumeration type 'enum uclass_id' [-Wenum-conversion]
>> >         if (log_uc_cat(cat) >= LOGC_NONE)
>> >             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~
>> > common/log.c:47:36: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum log_category_t' to different enumeration type 'enum uclass_id' [-Wenum-conversion]
>> >         return uclass_get_name(log_uc_cat(cat));
>> >                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~
>> > 2 warnings generated.
>> >
>> > Also, checkpatch.pl notes that the sandbox64 defconfig isn't caught by
>> > MAINTAINERS and then I see the 32bit one already isn't.
>> >
>> > Finally, I see a bunch of warnings on sandbox64:
>> > lib/fdtdec.c: In function ‘fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent’:
>> > include/fdtdec.h:27:25: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
>> >  #define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE (-1ULL)
>> >
>> > That's with my normal 64bit host gcc (5.4.0, Ubuntu 16.04).
>>
>> OK I'll drop sandbox64 for now. I'm not sure why buildman was happy,
>> but I may have missed it because there are already a lot of warnings
>> with sandbox. I'll see if I can fix those. I need to add clang to my
>> workflow...
>
> It's not too hard.  Note that if you go newer than 3.8 there's a ton of
> warnings I haven't had time to look into.  And I only test sandbox with
> clang atm.

I don't see any warnings doing this:

$ make -s -j10 HOSTCC=clang-3.8 O=b/sandbox/ sandbox_defconfig all
$ make -s -j10 HOSTCC=clang-3.8 O=b/sandbox64/ sandbox64_defconfig all
$

How do I get the warnings?

Regards
Simon