[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: make arm926ejs startup code thumb compatible
klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Fri Apr 20 22:11:31 UTC 2018
> On 20.04.2018, at 23:55, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 04/20/2018 09:51 PM, Klaus Goger wrote:
>> When building the mxs platform in thumb mode gcc generates code using
>> the intra procedure call scratch register (ip/r12) for the calling the
>> lowlevel_init function. This modifies the lr in flush_dcache which
>> causes u-boot proper to end in an endless loop.
>>
>> 40002334: e1a0c00e mov ip, lr
>> 40002338: eb00df4c bl 4003a070
>> <__lowlevel_init_from_arm>
>> 4000233c: e1a0e00c mov lr, ip
>> 40002340: e1a0f00e mov pc, lr
>> [...]
>> 4003a070 <__lowlevel_init_from_arm>:
>> 4003a070: e59fc004 ldr ip, [pc, #4] ; 4003a07c
>> <__lowlevel_init_from_arm+0xc>
>> 4003a074: e08fc00c add ip, pc, ip
>> 4003a078: e12fff1c bx ip
>> 4003a07c: fffc86cd .word 0xfffc86cd
>>
>> Instead of using the the ip/r12 register we use sl/r10 to preserve the
>> link register.
>>
>> According to "Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture" by ARM
>> subroutines have to preserve the contents of register r4-r8, r10, r11
>> and SP. So using r10 instead of r12 should be save.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner at theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - use bl instead of blx to call lowlevel_init
>> - remove mxs tag as it apply to all arm926ejs platforms
>
> What is lowlevel_init() is implemented as a C code and therefore thumb ?
> :-) doesn't ie. armv7a handle this somehow already ?
lowlevel_init() is implemented in C (you wrote it :)) and therefore thumb if
compiled as thumb.
armv7 lowlevel_init is implemented in assembly.
As the compiler will generate the necessary interwork code there was no need
to change the branch instruction to blx. So I changed it back to bl as the original
code as this will work with both generated codes (arm and thumb) and also
if someone decides to reimplement lowlevel_init as arm assembly.
>
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S
>> index 959d1ed86d..317df5c401 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S
>> @@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ flush_dcache:
>> /*
>> * Go setup Memory and board specific bits prior to relocation.
>> */
>> - mov ip, lr /* perserve link reg across call */
>> + mov sl, lr /* perserve link reg across call */
>> bl lowlevel_init /* go setup pll,mux,memory */
>> - mov lr, ip /* restore link */
>> + mov lr, sl /* restore link */
>> #endif
>> - mov pc, lr /* back to my caller */
>> + bx lr /* back to my caller */
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT */
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list