[U-Boot] Issues with Rockchips make_fit_atf.py on master

Kever Yang kever.yang at rock-chips.com
Thu Apr 26 03:48:12 UTC 2018


Hi Peter,


On 04/25/2018 05:44 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Kever,
>
> There's a problem with generating the FIT image for rockchips on
> recent 2018.05 RCs, errors below, I suspect due to changes in dtc.

Thanks for reporting this, but I don't know why I can't reproduce the issue,
the U-Boot has include dtc code now and we should have the same dtc.

The issue is clear and we can reference commit to fix.
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/dtc/commit/c9d9121683b35281239305e15adddfff2b462cf9
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/1/46

But I can't test it because I can't reproduce it :(
Could you help to test after I send a fix patch for it?

Thanks,
- Kever
>
> Peter
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/u-boot-2018.05-rc2/"arch/arm/mach-rockchip/make_fit_atf.py"
> \
> arch/arm/dts/rk3399-firefly.dtb > u-boot.its
>   ./tools/mkimage  -f u-boot.its -E u-boot.itb >/dev/null  && cat /dev/null
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/uboot at 1
> has a unit name, but no reg property
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/atf at 1 has
> a unit name, but no reg property
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/atf at 2 has
> a unit name, but no reg property
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/atf at 3 has
> a unit name, but no reg property
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/fdt at 1 has
> a unit name, but no reg property
> u-boot.itb.tmp: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
> /configurations/config at 1 has a unit name, but no reg property
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/u-boot-2018.05-rc2/builds/firefly-rk3399'
>




More information about the U-Boot mailing list