[U-Boot] MMC_DAVINCI not compliant with CONFIG_BLK

[Adam Ford]

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018, 5:22 PM Peter Howard <phoward at gme.net.au> wrote:

> Sorry a clarification - my main focus is the LCDK board - it's that one
> which has the 4K overrun.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Howard
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2018 8:22 AM
> To: 'Adam Ford' <aford173 at gmail.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <
> u-boot at lists.denx.de>
> Cc: David Lechner <david at lechnology.com>; Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>;
> Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>; Christoph Rüdisser <
> christoph.ruedisser at omicronenergy.com>; Manfred Rudigier <
> manfred.rudigier at omicronenergy.com>
> Subject: RE: MMC_DAVINCI not compliant with CONFIG_BLK
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> My normal email is broken at the moment sorry for inflicting Outlook on
> you ☹
>
>
> I've been working on this for a few weeks and at this stage I have a
> u-boot that builds.  The only problem is that introducing the DM into the
> SPL build (for NAND) currently overruns the SRAM area by 4K or so.
>


Is DM required in SPL?

There are a variety of drivers with #ifdef around various parts of the code.



> If you want to have a look I'm happy to send you my changes so-far.
>
> PJH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, 6 August 2018 10:11 PM
> To: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>
> Cc: Peter Howard <phoward at gme.net.au>; David Lechner <david at lechnology.com>;
> Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>; Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>; Christoph
> Rüdisser <christoph.ruedisser at omicronenergy.com>; Manfred Rudigier <
> manfred.rudigier at omicronenergy.com>
> Subject: MMC_DAVINCI not compliant with CONFIG_BLK
>
> From what I gathered over the weekend, the MMC_DAVINCI hasn't migrated to
> DM_MMC nor does CONFIG_BLK successfully build on ARCH_DAVINCI boards that
> enable MMC_DAVINCI.
>
> I started work to attempt to make it DM_MMC and OF_CONTROL compliant using
> the da850evm.
>
> Before I go too far, I just want to make sure nobody else is doing this
> work.  I don't want to duplicate an effort or waste time if it's been done
> or is in the works.
>
> If someone is interesting in testing the patch when I am done, it would be
> very helpful, because I only have the da850evm.  If someone has a patch and
> wants me to test it, I would also be willing to try it.
>
> adam
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>