[U-Boot] Disabling CONFIG_DM_I2C_COMPAT in twl4030 PMIC
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 14:45:30 UTC 2018
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:21 PM Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am working to disable CONFIG_DM_I2C_COMPAT for the omap3 boards.
> Some of these boards use the TWL4030 PMIC which is still using the
> older i2c_write and i2c_read functions.
>
> I wonder if someone can point me to a good patch that I can use a
> model one how to appropriately port I2C drivers forward? I'd like to
> disable this feature so the notice goes away since it seems like
> DM_I2C should be do-able by now.
>
More specifically, the TWL4030 has multiple I2C addresses, but it's
primary address is 0x48 and is assigned in the device tree as such. I
have been able to create the primary PMIC on address 0x48, but there
are multiple i2c addresses through which it can be addressed. The
device tree for the twl4030 lists multuple sub-regulators, but they
are not contained within 'regulators' node, and the bind function
cannot locate the children because there are no regulator-names
associated. The individual regulators are sub-nodes, but their
control registers are not necessarily on the same i2c address of the
primary. The additional i2c addresses are 0x49, 0x4a, and 0x4b, but
none are listed in the device tree.
What I'd like to do is replace the stock initialization sequence with
a more generic one that not only initializes the PMIC and all
corresponding registers, I'd also like to have it set all the
sub-regulators based on the voltage ratings listed by the device tree,
I was hoping someone might teach me the 'proper' way to create these
3 additional i2c devices (not shown on the device tree) on the same
I2C bus as the original, have them list all sub-regulators of the
original PMIC, and be able to address them individually.
thanks
adam
> thanks
>
> adam
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list