[U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers/ddr/fsl: Dual-license DDR driver

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:51:10PM +0000, York Sun wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 02:44 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 02/12/2018 11:41 PM, York Sun wrote:
> >> On 02/07/2018 11:48 AM, York Sun wrote:
> >>> To make this driver easier to be reused, dual-license DDR driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>
> >>> CC: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>> CC: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >>> CC: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> >>> CC: Thomas Schaefer <thomas.schaefer at kontron.com>
> >>> CC: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> >>> CC: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
> >>> CC: Alexander Merkle <alexander.merkle at lauterbach.com>
> >>> CC: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se>
> >>> CC: Curt Brune <curt at cumulusnetworks.com>
> >>> CC: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp at keymile.com>
> >>> CC: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
> >>> CC: Anatolij Gustschin <agust at denx.de>
> >>> CC: Ira W. Snyder <iws at ovro.caltech.edu>
> >>> CC: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> >>> CC: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett at boeing.com>
> >>> CC: Sebastien Carlier <sebastien.carlier at gmail.com>
> >>> CC: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
> >>> CC: Peter Tyser <ptyser at xes-inc.com>
> >>> CC: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
> >>> CC: Peter Tyser <ptyser at xes-inc.com>
> >>> CC: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>
> >> Applied to fsl-qoriq master, awaiting upstream.
> > 
> > Are you sure you can do that so easily ? Did you get ACK on this from
> > everyone who contributed to that driver ?
> 
> Nobody said anything. Some addresses bounced. And most changes made out
> people outside Freescale/NXP are minor changes, except twice the files
> were moved during U-Boot structure change. What options do I have?

So, I saw this when it was posted.  Am I pleased to see more code change
license terms? No.  Do I expect everyone to agree with this?  No.  Do I
accept the (nominally) technical arguments made about why this should be
done? Yes.  Can I object if someone who feels they do have standing to
object to this objects?  No.

Hope this helps.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180212/7290219a/attachment.sig>