[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 08/12] doc: TEE: Add documentation describing TEE in u-boot

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 26/02/18 14:56, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> Now, I am confused.

Fair enough.

In my view there are really only two required paths i.e. kever's stuff 
can use the existing "tee" type, let's not discuss a third option further.

So for clarity the proposal is

1. Maintain the existing "tee" as is.

    As regards changing the name of "tee" to "tee-standalone" I'd like
    to get Tom or Andrew (both) to say that's what is wanted.

    Since it's TI boards that are using the "tee" name in mkimage
    upstream the name-change is churn there.

    Andrew, Tom ?

2. Add a new bootable type
    The set of names we have for that is

    {tee-bootable, tee-chainload, tee-with-payload}

    I have no strong feelings about the name for the new type either way

    :)