[U-Boot] [RFC] Make U-Boot log great again

Sam Protsenko semen.protsenko at linaro.org
Tue Jul 17 22:14:31 UTC 2018


On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:01:14AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Sam Protsenko
>> >> <semen.protsenko at linaro.org> wrote:
>> >>> Hi guys,
>> >>>
>> >>> TL;DR This is a suggestion about fixing U-Boot log, which has got
>> >>> worse recently.
>> >>>
>> >>> Right now U-Boot and SPL logs are cluttered with bogus warnings like
>> >>> these (on X15 board, but I'm pretty sure it should appear on many
>> >>> others):
>> >>>
>> >>>     Loading Environment from FAT...
>> >>>     *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
>> >>>     Failed (-5)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Do we plan to fix this "Failed (-5)" message? It's very confusing.
>> > Like previous U-Boot just printing "*** Warning - bad CRC, using
>> > default environment" is enough I think.
>> >
>>
>> The v2018.07 release still has this "Failed (-5)" message on boot.
>> When do we plan to fix this?
>
> I don't mean for this to sound glib, but I was expecting patches to get
> posted to change this particular area at least.  I thought it had been
> talked to the point where it was understood what the next steps should
> look like?  Thanks/sorry!
>

Just to have something specific to discuss, I've sent two RFC patches:
[1,2]. I suggest we start with messages beautifying first, as this
seems to be main concern for most people.

Tom, what do you think about [1,2]? Does it have right to exist at
all, or should we go some other way?

Thanks.

[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-July/335071.html
[2] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-July/335072.html

> --
> Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list