[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] libfdt: split fdt_region declarations out to <fdt_region.h>

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Fri Mar 23 16:55:31 UTC 2018


Hi Masahiro,

On 23 March 2018 at 09:57, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> 2018-03-23 23:31 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>:
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 21 March 2018 at 03:03, Masahiro Yamada
>> <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
>>> fdt_region APIs are not part of libfdt.  They are U-Boot extension
>>> for the verified boot.  Split the declartions related to fdt_region
>>> out ot <fdt_region.h>.  This allows <linux/libfdt.h> to become a
>>> simple wrapper file, like Linux does.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  common/fdt_region.c    |   1 +
>>>  common/image-sig.c     |   1 +
>>>  include/fdt_region.h   | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  include/linux/libfdt.h | 299 ------------------------------------------------
>>>  tools/fdtgrep.c        |   1 +
>>>  tools/image-host.c     |   1 +
>>>  6 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 299 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 include/fdt_region.h
>>
>> I think moving the code into a separate header is fine, but I'm not
>> keen on putting the implementation in common/ as it is a feature of
>> libfdt. How does this actually help us?
>
> I want to clarify the boundary
> between the upstream code and U-Boot own code.
>
>
> If somebody tries to put new code into lib/libfdt/,
> he is doing wrong.

Will still do have some patches locally that are not fully upstream,
at least last time I looked. I'll take another look.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list