[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] spi: mxs_spi: DM conversion
Akash Gajjar
gajjar04akash at gmail.com
Fri May 11 11:09:03 UTC 2018
Hello Marek,
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 12:08 PM, Gajjar Akash wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > Thanks for the review comments.
> >
> > > -struct mxs_spi_slave {
> > > - struct spi_slave slave;
> > > - uint32_t max_khz;
> > > - uint32_t mode;
> > > - struct mxs_ssp_regs *regs;
> > > +struct mxs_spi_priv {
> > > + struct mxs_ssp_regs *regs;
> > > + u32 max_khz;
> > > + u32 mode;
> > > + u32 bus;
> > > + u32 cs;
> >
> > Type cleanup should be a separate patch
> >
> >
> > Okay, I will prepare seperate patch for type cleanup.
> >
> >
> > > };
> > > if (mxs_wait_mask_set(&ssp_regs->hw_ssp_ctrl0_reg,
> > > SSP_CTRL0_RUN, MXS_SPI_MAX_TIMEOUT)) {
> > > - printf("MXS SPI: Timeout waiting for
> start\n");
> > > + debug("MXS SPI: Timeout waiting for
> start\n");
> >
> > printf , we don't want to hide errors
> >
> >
> > okay, will revert it back to printf.
> >
> >
> > > return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > }
> >
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef __SPI_MXS_H
> > > +#define __SPI_MXS_H
> > > +
> > > +struct mxs_spi_platdata {
> > > + struct mxs_ssp_regs *regs;
> > > + u32 bus;
> > > + u32 max_hz;
> > > + u32 cs;
> >
> > Why is this header here at all ?
> >
> >
> > I didnt get this comment. do I need to place it somewhere else?
>
> See the beginning of this email, it seems the same structure exists twice.
>
My intention was to have two individual structure for private and platform
data.
But now I could use one structre and access its members using two structure
variables(one for private and one for platadata).
Is That looks okay?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
>
Thanks,
*Akash Gajjar*
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list