[U-Boot] [PATCH] efi_selftest: check for buffer overflow in efi_get_variable
Heinrich Schuchardt
xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Fri May 25 05:42:01 UTC 2018
On 05/25/2018 02:09 AM, Ivan Gorinov wrote:
> Check if GetVariable writes past the end of the output data buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Gorinov <ivan.gorinov at intel.com>
The patch produces build warnings:
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c: In function ‘execute’:
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c:75:10: warning: assignment
makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
data[3] = 0xff;
^
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c:87:14: warning: comparison
between pointer and integer
if (data[3] != 0xff) {
This is due to an inappropriate definition in my prior patch. Could you,
please, add this change:
-u8 *data[EFI_ST_MAX_DATA_SIZE];
+u8 data[EFI_ST_MAX_DATA_SIZE];
Otherwise your patch is fine.
Best regards
Heinrich
> ---
> lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c
> index f5e8eb6..8a02dbc 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_variables.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,22 @@ static int execute(void)
> efi_st_error("SetVariable failed\n");
> return EFI_ST_FAILURE;
> }
> + data[3] = 0xff;
> + len = 3;
> + ret = runtime->get_variable(L"efi_st_var0", &guid_vendor0,
> + &attr, &len, data);
> + if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> + efi_st_error("GetVariable failed\n");
> + return EFI_ST_FAILURE;
> + }
> + if (efi_st_memcmp(data, v + 4, 3)) {
> + efi_st_error("GetVariable returned wrong value\n");
> + return EFI_ST_FAILURE;
> + }
> + if (data[3] != 0xff) {
> + efi_st_error("GetVariable wrote past the end of the buffer\n");
> + return EFI_ST_FAILURE;
> + }
> /* Set variable 1 */
> ret = runtime->set_variable(L"efi_st_var1", &guid_vendor1,
> EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS,
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list