[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/6] common: iotrace: add timestamp to iotrace records
Ramon Fried
ramon.fried at gmail.com
Sat May 26 06:00:42 UTC 2018
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:07 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> HI Ramon,
>
> On 25 May 2018 at 04:41, Ramon Fried <ramon.fried at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add timestamp to each iotrace record to aid in debugging
>> of IO timing access bugs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried <ramon.fried at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> common/iotrace.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/iotrace.c b/common/iotrace.c
>> index f39885663a..3530688ab1 100644
>> --- a/common/iotrace.c
>> +++ b/common/iotrace.c
>> @@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ enum iotrace_flags {
>> * struct iotrace_record - Holds a single I/O trace record
>> *
>> * @flags: I/O access type
>> + * @timestamp: Timestamp of access
>> * @addr: Address of access
>> * @value: Value written or read
>> */
>> struct iotrace_record {
>> enum iotrace_flags flags;
>> + u64 timestamp;
>> phys_addr_t addr;
>> iovalue_t value;
>> };
>> @@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ static void add_record(int flags, const void *ptr, ulong value)
>> sizeof(value));
>> }
>>
>> + rec->timestamp = get_ticks();
>
> Would it not be better to use timer_get_us() here?
Yes. I'll change it. Thanks.
>
>> rec->flags = flags;
>> rec->addr = map_to_sysmem(ptr);
>> rec->value = value;
>> --
>> 2.17.0
>>
>
> Regards,
> Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list