[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-marvell v2 06/12] board: turris_mox: Cosmetic restructurization

Marek Behun marek.behun at nic.cz
Tue Nov 20 11:40:05 UTC 2018


On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:27:48 +0100
Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On 20.11.18 12:24, Marek Behun wrote:
> >> Any updates on this? Please rebase the still missing patches from
> >> this series on top of latest mainline.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stefan  
> > 
> > Hi Stefan,
> > I am (almost regularly) rebasing new patches on top of mainline in
> > this repository https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/turris/mox-u-boot
> > I did not sent the patches yet because I don't know if my model of
> > kernel devicetree patching will be accepter in kernel.
> > That is: I want to push a complete device-tree for Mox with nodes
> > for all modules to kernel, but with nodes for different modules
> > disabled. The code in u-boot shall then enable the nodes for devices
> > which are enumerated in u-boot. I don't yet know if such a
> > device-tree will be accepted in kernel though.  
> 
> That's a perfect understandable reasoning and makes sense. So its
> perhaps best if we remove the pending patches from the patchwork
> queue for now. And you will submit fresh patches, once such a
> decision has been made.
> 
> Okay?
> 

Hi,
I can send patches which won't be affected by this, though, like the
one that fixes A3720 watchdog implementation to be kernel compliant. I
am going to rebase and send them, ok?
Marek

> Thanks,
> Stefan



More information about the U-Boot mailing list